↓ Skip to main content

E-cadherin plays an essential role in collective directional migration of large epithelial sheets

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
E-cadherin plays an essential role in collective directional migration of large epithelial sheets
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00018-012-0951-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Li, Robert Hartley, Bjoern Reiss, Yaohui Sun, Jin Pu, Dan Wu, Francis Lin, Trung Hoang, Soichiro Yamada, Jianxin Jiang, Min Zhao

Abstract

In wound healing and development, large epithelial sheets migrate collectively, in defined directions, and maintain tight cell-cell adhesion. This type of movement ensures an essential function of epithelia, a barrier, which is lost when cells lose connection and move in isolation. Unless wounded, epithelial sheets in cultures normally do not have overall directional migration. Cell migration is mostly studied when cells are in isolation and in the absence of mature cell-cell adhesion; the mechanisms of the migration of epithelial sheets are less well understood. We used small electric fields (EFs) as a directional cue to instigate and guide migration of epithelial sheets. Significantly, cells in monolayer migrated far more efficiently and directionally than cells in isolation or smaller cell clusters. We demonstrated for the first time the group size-dependent directional migratory response in several types of epithelial cells. Gap junctions made a minimal contribution to the directional collective migration. Breaking down calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion significantly reduced directional sheet migration. Furthermore, E-cadherin blocking antibodies abolished migration of cell sheets. Traction force analysis revealed an important role of forces that cells in the leading rows exert on the substratum. With EF, the traction forces of the leading edge cells coordinated in directional re-orientation. Our study thus identifies a novel mechanism--E-cadherin dependence and coordinated traction forces of leading cells in collective directional migration of large epithelial sheets.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Israel 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 139 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 35%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Other 6 4%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 21%
Engineering 16 11%
Physics and Astronomy 13 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 21 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2012.
All research outputs
#21,141,111
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#3,769
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,003
of 158,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#37
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.