| Title |
Group medical consultation for osteoporosis: a prospective pilot study of patient experience in Canadian tertiary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x713081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma O Billington, A Lynn Feasel, Jessica L VanDyke, Gregory A Kline |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 22% |
| Librarian | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,757,084
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,547
of 4,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,019
of 412,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#39
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.