You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MYD88 L265P Somatic Mutation in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1200710 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven P Treon, Lian Xu, Guang Yang, Yangsheng Zhou, Xia Liu, Yang Cao, Patricia Sheehy, Robert J Manning, Christopher J Patterson, Christina Tripsas, Luca Arcaini, Geraldine S Pinkus, Scott J Rodig, Aliyah R Sohani, Nancy Lee Harris, Jason M Laramie, Donald A Skifter, Stephen E Lincoln, Zachary R Hunter |
| Abstract |
Waldenström's macroglobulinemia is an incurable, IgM-secreting lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL). The underlying mutation in this disorder has not been delineated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 24% |
| Mexico | 4 | 9% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 61% |
| Scientists | 9 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 513 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 503 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 108 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 15% |
| Other | 67 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 7% |
| Other | 102 | 20% |
| Unknown | 84 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 209 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 78 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 68 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 16 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 6% |
| Unknown | 100 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#481,278
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#6,484
of 32,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,348
of 190,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#70
of 335 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 335 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.