↓ Skip to main content

Techniques for the Optimization of Facial and Nonfacial Volumization with Injectable Poly-l-lactic Acid

Overview of attention for article published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Techniques for the Optimization of Facial and Nonfacial Volumization with Injectable Poly-l-lactic Acid
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00266-012-9920-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Z. Paul Lorenc

Abstract

With the recognition of the key role of volume loss in the facial aging process, injectable dermal fillers and volumizers have become increasingly important treatment options for recontouring and rejuvenating the aging face. While replacement fillers effectively correct individual lines and wrinkles, volumizing agents that replace collagen provide a longer-lasting, volume-based alternative. Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) has been shown to increase dermal thickness and volume for up to 2 years and beyond. Although early clinical use of this agent in patients with HIV-associated facial lipoatrophy was associated with a significant rate of nodule or papule formation, subsequent experience has helped define the proper reconstitution volumes and injection techniques for optimizing results and minimizing nodule/papule formation. While injectable PLLA has been used successfully for rejuvenation of most facial areas, increasing experience suggests that it is a versatile agent capable of providing aesthetic enhancement in multiple areas of the body, including the dorsum of the hands, the décolleté, the neck, the buttocks, the medial ankles, and acne scars. Although the current published experience in these areas is limited, further studies and clinical use of injectable PLLA will clarify the potential of this agent as a minimally invasive alternative and/or adjunct to surgery for restoring volume loss in multiple anatomic areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 21%
Student > Master 7 16%
Other 5 12%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Engineering 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 12 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,381,113
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#221
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,346
of 170,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.