| Title |
Integrating philosophy, policy and practice to create a just and fair health service
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/medethics-2020-106853 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zoe Fritz, Caitríona L Cox |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 47% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Guernsey | 1 | 5% |
| Comoros | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 42% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 48 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,644,396
of 24,289,456 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#587
of 3,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,305
of 419,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#23
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,289,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.