↓ Skip to main content

喉頭浮腫を合併したムンプス感染症の1症例

Overview of attention for article published in JIBI INKOKA TEMBO, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
喉頭浮腫を合併したムンプス感染症の1症例
Published in
JIBI INKOKA TEMBO, August 2009
DOI 10.11453/orltokyo.51.49
Authors

小林 俊樹, 平澤 良征, 宇田川 友克, 歌橋 弘哉, 飯田 誠

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 100%
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 200%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,565,356
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JIBI INKOKA TEMBO
#6
of 76 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,393
of 122,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JIBI INKOKA TEMBO
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them