↓ Skip to main content

Phonotactic probability of brand names: I’d buy that!

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Research, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Phonotactic probability of brand names: I’d buy that!
Published in
Psychological Research, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00426-011-0374-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael S. Vitevitch, Alexander J. Donoso

Abstract

Psycholinguistic research shows that word-characteristics influence the speed and accuracy of various language-related processes. Analogous characteristics of brand names influence the retrieval of product information and the perception of risks associated with that product. In the present experiment we examined how phonotactic probability-the frequency with which phonological segments and sequences of segments appear in a word-might influence consumer behavior. Participants rated brand names that varied in phonotactic probability on the likelihood that they would buy the product. Participants indicated that they were more likely to purchase a product if the brand name was comprised of common segments and sequences of segments rather than less common segments and sequences of segments. This result suggests that word-characteristics may influence higher-level cognitive processes, in addition to language-related processes. Furthermore, the benefits of using objective measures of word characteristics in the design of brand names are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 9%
Spain 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 27 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Student > Master 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 34%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 19%
Linguistics 6 19%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2012.
All research outputs
#18,313,878
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#758
of 961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,238
of 124,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.