| Title |
Diagnosis and management of asthma – Statement on the 2015 GINA Guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Medica Austriaca, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00508-016-1019-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fritz Horak, Daniel Doberer, Ernst Eber, Elisabeth Horak, Wolfgang Pohl, Josef Riedler, Zsolt Szépfalusi, Felix Wantke, Angela Zacharasiewicz, Michael Studnicka |
| Abstract |
This statement was written by a group of pulmonologists and pediatric pulmonologists belonging to the corresponding professional associations ÖGP (Austrian Society for Pulmonology) and ÖGKJ (Austrian Society for pediatric and adolescent medicine) to provide a concise overview of the latest updates in the 2015 GINA Guidelines and to include aspects that are specific to Austria. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Colombia | 1 | 20% |
| Argentina | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 288 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 43 | 15% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Unknown | 85 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 105 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 90 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,937,022
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Acta Medica Austriaca
#49
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,430
of 367,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Medica Austriaca
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.