↓ Skip to main content

Science as instrumental reason: Heidegger, Habermas, Heisenberg

Overview of attention for article published in Continental Philosophy Review, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Science as instrumental reason: Heidegger, Habermas, Heisenberg
Published in
Continental Philosophy Review, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11007-009-9124-y
Authors

Cathryn Carson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Poland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 37 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 27%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 32%
Philosophy 9 22%
Computer Science 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2016.
All research outputs
#14,728,418
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Continental Philosophy Review
#108
of 204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,412
of 165,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Continental Philosophy Review
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 204 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.