You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
虹彩色の異なる2群間における色の見えの差異
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Physiological Anthropology, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.20718/jjpa.12.2_111 |
| Authors |
庄山 茂子, 川口 順子, 栃原 裕 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 13% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 98% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,252,478
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#42
of 452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,321
of 87,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them