↓ Skip to main content

A Review of Safety and Design Requirements of the Artificial Pancreas

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
A Review of Safety and Design Requirements of the Artificial Pancreas
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10439-016-1679-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helga Blauw, Patrick Keith-Hynes, Robin Koops, J. Hans DeVries

Abstract

As clinical studies with artificial pancreas systems for automated blood glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes move to unsupervised real-life settings, product development will be a focus of companies over the coming years. Directions or requirements regarding safety in the design of an artificial pancreas are, however, lacking. This review aims to provide an overview and discussion of safety and design requirements of the artificial pancreas. We performed a structured literature search based on three search components-type 1 diabetes, artificial pancreas, and safety or design-and extended the discussion with our own experiences in developing artificial pancreas systems. The main hazards of the artificial pancreas are over- and under-dosing of insulin and, in case of a bi-hormonal system, of glucagon or other hormones. For each component of an artificial pancreas and for the complete system we identified safety issues related to these hazards and proposed control measures. Prerequisites that enable the control algorithms to provide safe closed-loop control are accurate and reliable input of glucose values, assured hormone delivery and an efficient user interface. In addition, the system configuration has important implications for safety, as close cooperation and data exchange between the different components is essential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 122 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 31 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 32 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 15%
Computer Science 7 6%
Materials Science 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 33 27%