↓ Skip to main content

The interplay of goal-driven and stimulus-driven influences on spatial orienting

Overview of attention for article published in Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
The interplay of goal-driven and stimulus-driven influences on spatial orienting
Published in
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, June 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13414-016-1121-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mara Otten, Daniel Schreij, Sander A. Los

Abstract

Search for a target stimulus among distractors is subject to both goal-driven and stimulus-driven influences. Variables that selectively modify these influences have shown strong interaction effects on saccade trajectories toward the target, suggesting the involvement of a shared spatial orienting mechanism. However, subsequent manual response times (RTs) have revealed additive effects, suggesting that different mechanisms are involved. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that an interaction for RTs is obscured by preceding multisaccade trajectories, promoted by the continuous presence of distractors in the display. In two experiments, we compared a condition in which distractors were removed soon after the presentation of the search display to a standard condition in which distractors were not removed. The results showed additive goal-driven and stimulus-driven effects on RTs in the standard condition, but an interaction when distractors were removed. These findings support the view that both variables influence a shared spatial orienting mechanism.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 20%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 4 13%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 53%
Neuroscience 4 13%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 2 7%