| Title |
Classification of aerosol-generating procedures: a rapid systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open Respiratory Research, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000730 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanya Jackson, Danika Deibert, Graeme Wyatt, Quentin Durand-Moreau, Anil Adisesh, Kamlesh Khunti, Sachin Khunti, Simon Smith, Xin Hui S Chan, Lawrence Ross, Nia Roberts, Elaine Toomey, Trisha Greenhalgh, Isheeta Arora, Susannah M Black, Jonathan Drake, Nandana Syam, Robert Temple, Sebastian Straube |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 565 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 120 | 21% |
| Australia | 37 | 7% |
| United States | 32 | 6% |
| Canada | 29 | 5% |
| Ireland | 15 | 3% |
| Spain | 8 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| India | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 46 | 8% |
| Unknown | 264 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 425 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 70 | 12% |
| Scientists | 52 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 271 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 20% |
| Unknown | 94 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 7% |
| Engineering | 12 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 104 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 453. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#62,336
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#3
of 724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,037
of 438,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Respiratory Research
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.