You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sinks for nitrogen inputs in terrestrial ecosystems: a meta‐analysis of 15N tracer field studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1890/11-1146.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. H. Templer, M. C. Mack, F. S. Chapin, L. M. Christenson, J. E. Compton, H. D. Crook, W. S. Currie, C. J. Curtis, D. B. Dail, C. M. D'Antonio, B. A. Emmett, H. E. Epstein, C. L. Goodale, P Gundersen, S. E. Hobbie, K Holland, D. U. Hooper, B. A. Hungate, S Lamontagne, K. J. Nadelhoffer, C. W. Osenberg, S. S. Perakis, P Schleppi, J Schimel, I. K. Schmidt, M Sommerkorn, J Spoelstra, A Tietema, W. W. Wessel, D. R. Zak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 307 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 27% |
| Researcher | 61 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 115 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 26 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Materials Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 3% |
| Unknown | 74 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,304,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecology
#3,301
of 7,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,423
of 183,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology
#19
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,541 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.