| Title |
Sonographic evaluation of the diaphragm in critically ill patients. Technique and clinical applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-2823-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dimitrios Matamis, Eleni Soilemezi, Matthew Tsagourias, Evangelia Akoumianaki, Saoussen Dimassi, Filippo Boroli, Jean-Christophe M. Richard, Laurent Brochard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 608 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 5 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 592 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 77 | 13% |
| Researcher | 65 | 11% |
| Other | 63 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 9% |
| Other | 164 | 27% |
| Unknown | 127 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 357 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Engineering | 8 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 6% |
| Unknown | 150 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,516,752
of 23,956,119 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,698
of 5,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,123
of 286,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#14
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,956,119 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.