Title |
Randomized trial of long-term effects of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation on chronic pelvic pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00404-014-3190-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ayse Istek, Funda Gungor Ugurlucan, Cenk Yasa, Sule Gokyildiz, Onay Yalcin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Researcher | 9 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 34 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 39 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,465,367
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#167
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,677
of 222,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.