| Title |
A benchmark study on problems related to CO2 storage in geologic formations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computational Geosciences, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10596-009-9146-x |
| Authors |
Holger Class, Anozie Ebigbo, Rainer Helmig, Helge K. Dahle, Jan M. Nordbotten, Michael A. Celia, Pascal Audigane, Melanie Darcis, Jonathan Ennis-King, Yaqing Fan, Bernd Flemisch, Sarah E. Gasda, Min Jin, Stefanie Krug, Diane Labregere, Ali Naderi Beni, Rajesh J. Pawar, Adil Sbai, Sunil G. Thomas, Laurent Trenty, Lingli Wei |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 22% |
| Researcher | 30 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 35 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 34 | 22% |
| Energy | 9 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 7 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,719,007
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Computational Geosciences
#8
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,354
of 110,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Geosciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them