| Title |
Towards an SSM toolkit: rich picture diagramming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Information Systems, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1057/ejis.1992.17 |
| Authors |
D. E. Avison, P. A. Golder, H. U. Shah |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 49 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 42 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 34 | 20% |
| Engineering | 14 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Design | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 41 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,485,894
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Information Systems
#92
of 320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,925
of 439,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Information Systems
#35
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.