You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
NICE guidance on long-term sickness and incapacity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp11x561221 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Gabbay, Lorraine Taylor, Linda Sheppard, Jim Hillage, Clare Bambra, Fiona Ford, Richard Preece, Nichole Taske, Michael P Kelly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cayman Islands | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,319,012
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,117
of 4,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,006
of 110,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.