Title |
First direct, site-wide penguin survey at Deception Island, Antarctica, suggests significant declines in breeding chinstrap penguins
|
---|---|
Published in |
Polar Biology, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00300-012-1230-3 |
Authors |
Ron Naveen, Heather J. Lynch, Steven Forrest, Thomas Mueller, Michael Polito |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 63 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 34% |
Environmental Science | 17 | 26% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2012.
All research outputs
#2,857,802
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#209
of 1,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,006
of 169,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.