You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What evidence is being used to inform municipal strategic planning for health and wellbeing? Victoria, Australia, a case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1332/174426416x14655655062000 |
| Authors |
Geoffrey R Browne, Melanie Davern, Billie Giles-Corti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 45% |
| Finland | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 19% |
| Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,075,774
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
#215
of 483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,183
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.