| Title |
Prevalence, extension and characteristics of fluid-fluid levels in bone and soft tissue tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-006-0250-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
P. Van Dyck, F. M. Vanhoenacker, J. Vogel, C. Venstermans, H. M. Kroon, J. Gielen, P. M. Parizel, J. L. Bloem, A. M. A. De Schepper |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 11 | 28% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 80% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,191,633
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#465
of 4,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,822
of 66,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.