| Title |
Matrix‐induced autologous chondrocyte implantation versus microfracture in the treatment of cartilage defects of the knee: a 2‐year randomised study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00167-009-1028-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erhan Basad, Bernd Ishaque, Georg Bachmann, Henning Stürz, Jürgen Steinmeyer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 274 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 17% |
| Researcher | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 68 | 24% |
| Unknown | 43 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 36% |
| Engineering | 40 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,425,032
of 23,868,111 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#243
of 2,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,065
of 168,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,111 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.