| Title |
Assessing supply-side barriers to uptake of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy: a qualitative study and document and record review in two regions of Uganda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-016-1405-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Rassi, Kirstie Graham, Patrobas Mufubenga, Rebecca King, Joslyn Meier, Sam Siduda Gudoi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 297 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 14% |
| Researcher | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 77 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 16% |
| Unknown | 86 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2016.
All research outputs
#16,363,465
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,937
of 5,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,434
of 375,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#73
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.