| Title |
Red flags presented in current low back pain guidelines: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-016-4684-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arianne P. Verhagen, Aron Downie, Nahid Popal, Chris Maher, Bart W. Koes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 23% |
| United States | 6 | 7% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| Australia | 5 | 6% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 79% |
| Scientists | 11 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 756 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 751 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 125 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 113 | 15% |
| Other | 81 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 58 | 8% |
| Researcher | 48 | 6% |
| Other | 134 | 18% |
| Unknown | 197 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 245 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 179 | 24% |
| Sports and Recreations | 43 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 22 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 4% |
| Unknown | 224 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#691,661
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#56
of 5,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,405
of 375,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#1
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,388 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.