↓ Skip to main content

Random Walks and Branching Processes in Correlated Gaussian Environment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Statistical Physics, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Random Walks and Branching Processes in Correlated Gaussian Environment
Published in
Journal of Statistical Physics, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10955-016-1677-7
Authors

Frank Aurzada, Alexis Devulder, Nadine Guillotin-Plantard, Françoise Pène

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Professor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2016.
All research outputs
#19,246,640
of 23,852,579 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Statistical Physics
#936
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#308,570
of 419,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Statistical Physics
#26
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,852,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.