| Title |
A Behavior Change Model for Internet Interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12160-009-9133-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lee M. Ritterband, Frances P. Thorndike, Daniel J. Cox, Boris P. Kovatchev, Linda A. Gonder-Frederick |
| Abstract |
The Internet has become a major component to health care and has important implications for the future of the health care system. One of the most notable aspects of the Web is its ability to provide efficient, interactive, and tailored content to the user. Given the wide reach and extensive capabilities of the Internet, researchers in behavioral medicine have been using it to develop and deliver interactive and comprehensive treatment programs with the ultimate goal of impacting patient behavior and reducing unwanted symptoms. To date, however, many of these interventions have not been grounded in theory or developed from behavior change models, and no overarching model to explain behavior change in Internet interventions has yet been published. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 30% |
| Australia | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 684 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 13 | 2% |
| Unknown | 628 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 130 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 130 | 19% |
| Researcher | 108 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 6% |
| Other | 133 | 19% |
| Unknown | 94 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 235 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 56 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 46 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 6% |
| Other | 107 | 16% |
| Unknown | 126 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,181,414
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#343
of 1,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,165
of 102,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.