| Title |
Étude pilote randomisée comparant la vidéo-laryngoscopie et la laryngoscopie directe chez les patients gravement malades
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12630-012-9775-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald E. G. Griesdale, Anthony Chau, George Isac, Najib Ayas, Denise Foster, Corrie Irwin, Peter Choi, for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group |
| Abstract |
Endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients is associated with a high risk of complications that tend to increase with multiple attempts at laryngoscopy. In this pilot study, we compared direct laryngoscopy (DL) with video-laryngoscopy (VL) with regard to the number of attempts and other clinical parameters during endotracheal intubation of critically ill patients performed by novice providers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 25% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 55% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2012.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2,496
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,591
of 187,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.