You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using systematic conservation planning to minimize REDD+ conflict with agriculture and logging in the tropics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00287.x |
| Authors |
Oscar Venter, Hugh P. Possingham, Lex Hovani, Sonya Dewi, Bronson Griscom, Gary Paoli, Phillip Wells, Kerrie A. Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 13% |
| Fiji | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 49 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 78 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 62 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,307,608
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#712
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,966
of 187,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.