| Title |
The contribution of transgenic plants to better health through improved nutrition: opportunities and constraints
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genes & Nutrition, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12263-012-0315-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduard Pérez-Massot, Raviraj Banakar, Sonia Gómez-Galera, Uxue Zorrilla-López, Georgina Sanahuja, Gemma Arjó, Bruna Miralpeix, Evangelia Vamvaka, Gemma Farré, Sol Maiam Rivera, Svetlana Dashevskaya, Judit Berman, Maite Sabalza, Dawei Yuan, Chao Bai, Ludovic Bassie, Richard M. Twyman, Teresa Capell, Paul Christou, Changfu Zhu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| Hungary | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 66 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 100 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 82 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,919,343
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#75
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,435
of 192,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.