↓ Skip to main content

Malaria infection alters the expression of B‐cell activating factor resulting in diminished memory antibody responses and survival

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Immunology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Malaria infection alters the expression of B‐cell activating factor resulting in diminished memory antibody responses and survival
Published in
European Journal of Immunology, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/eji.201242689
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xue Q. Liu, Katryn J. Stacey, Joshua M. Horne‐Debets, Jasmyn A. Cridland, Katja Fischer, David Narum, Fabienne Mackay, Susan K. Pierce, Michelle N. Wykes

Abstract

Malaria is a major cause of morbidity worldwide with reports of over 200-500 million infected individuals and nearly 1 million deaths each year. Antibodies have been shown to play a critical role in controlling the blood stage of this disease; however, in malaria-endemic areas antibody immunity is slow to develop despite years of exposure to Plasmodium spp. the causative parasite. Using rodent Plasmodium yoelii YM, we provide evidence that malarial infections result in a decrease in the proportion of DCs that express the B-cell survival factor, BAFF, resulting in a decreased ability of these DCs to support memory B-cell differentiation into antibody secreting cells (ASCs) and/or the survival of ASCs. Further, compared with infected WT mice, ASC numbers were significantly increased in malaria-infected transgenic mice that either overexpressed BAFF or mice with BAFF-independent B-cell survival (B-cell-restricted TRAF3 deletion). Remarkably, BAFF-overexpressing mice were protected from lethal malaria infections, indicating the significance of the role BAFF plays in determining the outcome of malaria infections. These findings describe a previously unappreciated mechanism by which Plasmodium spp. can depress the generation of protective antibody responses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Burkina Faso 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 48 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 27%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 15%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 46%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,039,697
of 24,629,540 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Immunology
#6,338
of 6,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,462
of 180,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Immunology
#21
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,629,540 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.