Title |
Situated instructional coaching: a case study of faculty professional development
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of STEM Education, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40594-016-0044-1 |
Authors |
Charles Doug Czajka, David McConnell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 22% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 15% |
Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
Lecturer | 6 | 5% |
Researcher | 5 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 15% |
Unknown | 31 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 42 | 34% |
Arts and Humanities | 6 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 20% |
Unknown | 37 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2016.
All research outputs
#3,067,804
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of STEM Education
#72
of 348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,022
of 352,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of STEM Education
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.