↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Deutetrabenazine on Chorea Among Patients With Huntington Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
31 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
322 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Deutetrabenazine on Chorea Among Patients With Huntington Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2016
DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.8655
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel Frank, Claudia M. Testa, David Stamler, Elise Kayson, Charles Davis, Mary C. Edmondson, Shari Kinel, Blair Leavitt, David Oakes, Christine O’Neill, Christina Vaughan, Jody Goldstein, Margaret Herzog, Victoria Snively, Jacquelyn Whaley, Cynthia Wong, Greg Suter, Joseph Jankovic, Joohi Jimenez-Shahed, Christine Hunter, Daniel O. Claassen, Olivia C. Roman, Victor Sung, Jenna Smith, Sarah Janicki, Ronda Clouse, Marie Saint-Hilaire, Anna Hohler, Denyse Turpin, Raymond C. James, Ramon Rodriguez, Kyle Rizer, Karen E. Anderson, Hope Heller, Alexis Carlson, Susan Criswell, Brad A Racette, Fredy J. Revilla, Frederick Nucifora, Russell L. Margolis, MaryJane Ong, Tilak Mendis, Neila Mendis, Carlos Singer, Monica Quesada, Jane S. Paulsen, Thomas Brashers-Krug, Amanda Miller, Jane Kerr, Richard M. Dubinsky, Carolyn Gray, Stewart A. Factor, Elaine Sperin, Eric Molho, Mary Eglow, Sharon Evans, Rajeev Kumar, Christina Reeves, Ali Samii, Sylvain Chouinard, Monica Beland, Burton L. Scott, Patrick T. Hickey, Sherali Esmail, Wai Lun Alan Fung, Clare Gibbons, Lina Qi, Amy Colcher, Cory Hackmyer, Andrew McGarry, Kevin Klos, Mark Gudesblatt, Lori Fafard, Laura Graffitti, Daniel P. Schneider, Rohit Dhall, Joanne M. Wojcieszek, Kathrin LaFaver, Andrew Duker, Erin Neefus, Hilary Wilson-Perez, David Shprecher, Paola Wall, Karen A. Blindauer, Lynn Wheeler, James T. Boyd, Emily Houston, Eric S. Farbman, Pinky Agarwal, Shirley W. Eberly, Arthur Watts, Pierre N. Tariot, Andrew Feigin, Scott Evans, Chris Beck, Constance Orme, Jon Edicola, Emily Christopher

Abstract

Deutetrabenazine is a novel molecule containing deuterium, which attenuates CYP2D6 metabolism and increases active metabolite half-lives and may therefore lead to stable systemic exposure while preserving key pharmacological activity. To evaluate efficacy and safety of deutetrabenazine treatment to control chorea associated with Huntington disease. Ninety ambulatory adults diagnosed with manifest Huntington disease and a baseline total maximal chorea score of 8 or higher (range, 0-28; lower score indicates less chorea) were enrolled from August 2013 to August 2014 and randomized to receive deutetrabenazine (n = 45) or placebo (n = 45) in a double-blind fashion at 34 Huntington Study Group sites. Deutetrabenazine or placebo was titrated to optimal dose level over 8 weeks and maintained for 4 weeks, followed by a 1-week washout. Primary end point was the total maximal chorea score change from baseline (the average of values from the screening and day-0 visits) to maintenance therapy (the average of values from the week 9 and 12 visits) obtained by in-person visits. This study was designed to detect a 2.7-unit treatment difference in scores. The secondary end points, assessed hierarchically, were the proportion of patients who achieved treatment success on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), the change in 36-Item Short Form- physical functioning subscale score (SF-36), and the change in the Berg Balance Test. Ninety patients with Huntington disease (mean age, 53.7 years; 40 women [44.4%]) were enrolled. In the deutetrabenazine group, the mean total maximal chorea scores improved from 12.1 (95% CI, 11.2-12.9) to 7.7 (95% CI, 6.5-8.9), whereas in the placebo group, scores improved from 13.2 (95% CI, 12.2-14.3) to 11.3 (95% CI, 10.0-12.5); the mean between-group difference was -2.5 units (95% CI, -3.7 to -1.3) (P < .001). Treatment success, as measured by the PGIC, occurred in 23 patients (51%) in the deutetrabenazine group vs 9 (20%) in the placebo group (P = .002). As measured by the CGIC, treatment success occurred in 19 patients (42%) in the deutetrabenazine group vs 6 (13%) in the placebo group (P = .002). In the deutetrabenazine group, the mean SF-36 physical functioning subscale scores decreased from 47.5 (95% CI, 44.3-50.8) to 47.4 (44.3-50.5), whereas in the placebo group, scores decreased from 43.2 (95% CI, 40.2-46.3) to 39.9 (95% CI, 36.2-43.6), for a treatment benefit of 4.3 (95% CI, 0.4 to 8.3) (P = .03). There was no difference between groups (mean difference of 1.0 unit; 95% CI, -0.3 to 2.3; P = .14), for improvement in the Berg Balance Test, which improved by 2.2 units (95% CI, 1.3-3.1) in the deutetrabenazine group and by 1.3 units (95% CI, 0.4-2.2) in the placebo group. Adverse event rates were similar for deutetrabenazine and placebo, including depression, anxiety, and akathisia. Among patients with chorea associated with Huntington disease, the use of deutetrabenazine compared with placebo resulted in improved motor signs at 12 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the clinical importance of the effect size and to determine longer-term efficacy and safety. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01795859.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 320 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 11%
Student > Master 33 10%
Researcher 28 9%
Other 26 8%
Other 68 21%
Unknown 93 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 19%
Neuroscience 36 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 7%
Psychology 20 6%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 107 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#217,336
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,961
of 36,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,279
of 370,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#66
of 429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.