| Title |
Is metabarcoding suitable for estuarine plankton monitoring? A comparative study with microscopy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-016-2920-0 |
| Authors |
David Abad, Aitor Albaina, Mikel Aguirre, Aitor Laza-Martínez, Ibon Uriarte, Arantza Iriarte, Fernando Villate, Andone Estonba |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 22% |
| Researcher | 45 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 37 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Unknown | 59 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2016.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#2,979
of 3,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,535
of 371,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#26
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.