You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Getting to the root of restoration: considering root traits for improved restoration outcomes under drought and competition
|
---|---|
Published in |
Restoration Ecology, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1111/rec.13291 |
Authors |
Magda Garbowski, Bethany Avera, Jonathan H Bertram, Jacob S Courkamp, Jesse Gray, Kirsten M Hein, Ryan Lawrence, Mariah McIntosh, Shelby McClelland, Alison K Post, Ingrid J Slette, Daniel E Winkler, Cynthia S Brown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 41% |
Australia | 2 | 6% |
Germany | 2 | 6% |
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 16 | 47% |
Members of the public | 15 | 44% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 20% |
Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
Researcher | 13 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 34% |
Environmental Science | 21 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 24 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,638,294
of 25,295,968 outputs
Outputs from Restoration Ecology
#155
of 1,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,840
of 428,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Restoration Ecology
#15
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,295,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.