↓ Skip to main content

High-throughput classification of clinical populations from natural viewing eye movements

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
Title
High-throughput classification of clinical populations from natural viewing eye movements
Published in
Journal of Neurology, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00415-012-6631-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Po-He Tseng, Ian G. M. Cameron, Giovanna Pari, James N. Reynolds, Douglas P. Munoz, Laurent Itti

Abstract

Many high-prevalence neurological disorders involve dysfunctions of oculomotor control and attention, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD), and Parkinson's disease (PD). Previous studies have examined these deficits with clinical neurological evaluation, structured behavioral tasks, and neuroimaging. Yet, time and monetary costs prevent deploying these evaluations to large at-risk populations, which is critically important for earlier detection and better treatment. We devised a high-throughput, low-cost method where participants simply watched television while we recorded their eye movements. We combined eye-tracking data from patients and controls with a computational model of visual attention to extract 224 quantitative features. Using machine learning in a workflow inspired by microarray analysis, we identified critical features that differentiate patients from control subjects. With eye movement traces recorded from only 15 min of videos, we classified PD versus age-matched controls with 89.6 % accuracy (chance 63.2 %), and ADHD versus FASD versus control children with 77.3 % accuracy (chance 40.4 %). Our technique provides new quantitative insights into which aspects of attention and gaze control are affected by specific disorders. There is considerable promise in using this approach as a potential screening tool that is easily deployed, low-cost, and high-throughput for clinical disorders, especially in young children and elderly populations who may be less compliant to traditional evaluation tests.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 329 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 20%
Researcher 55 16%
Student > Master 42 12%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Professor 17 5%
Other 73 21%
Unknown 56 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 66 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 14%
Computer Science 41 12%
Neuroscience 39 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 7%
Other 60 17%
Unknown 71 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,346,261
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#171
of 5,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,826
of 191,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.