| Title |
Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence in the 1900s relating smoking to lung cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Cancer, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-385 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter N Lee, Barbara A Forey, Katharine J Coombs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 204 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 15% |
| Researcher | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 52 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 70 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#514,182
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#53
of 9,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,559
of 187,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#1
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,097 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.