| Title |
Identifying prey items from New Zealand fur seal (Arctocephalus forsteri) faeces using massive parallel sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics Resources, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12686-016-0560-9 |
| Authors |
Arsalan Emami-Khoyi, David A. Hartley, Adrian M. Paterson, Laura J. Boren, Robert H. Cruickshank, James G. Ross, Elaine C. Murphy, Terry-Ann Else |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 7 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2020.
All research outputs
#540,986
of 24,469,913 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics Resources
#2
of 352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,127
of 359,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics Resources
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,469,913 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 352 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.