You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Artificial nightlight alters the predator–prey dynamics of an apex carnivore
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecography, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ecog.05251 |
| Authors |
Mark A. Ditmer, David C. Stoner, Clinton D. Francis, Jesse R. Barber, James D. Forester, David M. Choate, Kirsten E. Ironside, Kathleen M. Longshore, Kent R. Hersey, Randy T. Larsen, Brock R. McMillan, Daniel D. Olson, Alyson M. Andreasen, Jon P. Beckmann, P. Brandon Holton, Terry A. Messmer, Neil H. Carter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 7% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 50 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 51% |
| Scientists | 52 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 166 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 20% |
| Unknown | 47 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 56 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 62 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#269,747
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Ecography
#36
of 2,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,908
of 440,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecography
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.