↓ Skip to main content

Involvement of spinal sensory pathway in ALS and specificity of cord atrophy to lower motor neuron degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Involvement of spinal sensory pathway in ALS and specificity of cord atrophy to lower motor neuron degeneration
Published in
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, August 2012
DOI 10.3109/17482968.2012.701308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julien Cohen-Adad, Mohamed-Mounir El Mendili, Régine Morizot-Koutlidis, Stéphane Lehéricy, Vincent Meininger, Sophie Blancho, Serge Rossignol, Habib Benali, Pierre-François Pradat

Abstract

Our objective was to demonstrate that ALS patients have sensory pathway involvement and that local cord atrophy reflects segmental lower motor neuron involvement. Twenty-nine ALS patients with spinal onset and twenty-one healthy controls were recruited. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), magnetization transfer and atrophy index were measured in the spinal cord, complemented with transcranial magnetic stimulations. Metrics were quantified within the lateral corticospinal and the dorsal segments of the cervical cord. Significant differences were detected between patients and controls for DTI and magnetization transfer metrics in the lateral and dorsal segments of the spinal cord. Fractional anisotropy correlated with ALSFRS-R (p = 0.04) and motor threshold (p = 0.02). Stepwise linear regression detected local spinal cord atrophy associated with weakness in the corresponding muscle territory, i.e. C4 level for deltoid and C7 level for hand muscles. In conclusion, impairment of spinal sensory pathways was detected at an early stage of the disease. Our data also demonstrate an association between muscle deficits and local spinal cord atrophy, suggesting that atrophy is a sensitive biomarker for lower motor neurons degeneration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 28%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 30%
Neuroscience 20 22%
Engineering 9 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 21 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2012.
All research outputs
#14,474,215
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
#833
of 1,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,521
of 186,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.