↓ Skip to main content

Joint position sense and vibratory perception sense in patients with Ehlers–Danlos syndrome type III (hypermobility type)

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Joint position sense and vibratory perception sense in patients with Ehlers–Danlos syndrome type III (hypermobility type)
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10067-009-1320-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lies Rombaut, Anne De Paepe, Fransiska Malfait, Ann Cools, Patrick Calders

Abstract

Neurophysiological deficits could make patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) type III (hypermobility type) more vulnerable to musculoskeletal problems, particularly to joint instability. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether joint position sense (JPS) and vibratory perception sense (VPS) in EDS type III patients in the knee and shoulder joints are impaired. Thirty-two female EDS type III patients as defined by the Villefranche criteria and 32 individually gender- and age-matched healthy control subjects were included in the study. Range of motion was determined using a goniometer, passive and active JPS were assessed with an isokinetic dynamometer system, and the VPS was measured by a biothesiometer. Daily physical activity was evaluated by the Baecke questionnaire. The EDS type III group showed significantly larger ranges of movement (P < 0.05) and lower levels of sport physical activity (SPA) compared to the control group (P = 0.023). Considering SPA as covariate, the EDS type III group demonstrated a significant impairment in knee joint reposition compared to the control group (P = 0.018). No significant differences were found for shoulder JPS. The VPS was not significantly different in the EDS type III group compared to the control group. In addition, no significant correlation was found between JPS and VPS, neither at the knee nor at the shoulder joint. This is the first study examining proprioception deficits in EDS type III patients as defined by the Villefranche criteria. Further research on the neurophysiological dysfunctions and mechanisms in this pathologic entity is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 139 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 14%
Sports and Recreations 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 36 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,856,323
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#385
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,853
of 165,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.