You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutrition Study Design Issues—Important Issues for Interpretation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Health Promotion, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0890117120960580d |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher D. Gardner, Anthony Crimarco, Matthew J. Landry, Priya Fielding-Singh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 14 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,381,095
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Health Promotion
#119
of 1,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,765
of 439,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Health Promotion
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.