↓ Skip to main content

A Pilot Study of Parent Training in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Disruptive Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
A Pilot Study of Parent Training in Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Disruptive Behavior
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1624-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Bearss, Cynthia Johnson, Benjamin Handen, Tristram Smith, Lawrence Scahill

Abstract

Guidance on effective interventions for disruptive behavior in young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) is limited. We present feasibility and initial efficacy data on a structured parent training program for 16 children (ages 3-6) with ASD and disruptive behavior. The 6-month intervention included 11 Core and up to 2 Optional sessions. The program was acceptable to parents as evidenced by an attendance rate of 84 % for Core sessions. Fourteen of 16 families completed the treatment. An independent clinician rated 14 of 16 subjects as much improved or very much improved at Week 24. Using last observation carried forward, the parent-rated Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability subscale decreased 54 % from 16.00 (SD = 9.21) to 7.38 (SD = 6.15).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 275 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Other 54 19%
Unknown 59 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 92 33%
Social Sciences 42 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Neuroscience 6 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 72 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,461,663
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,825
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,745
of 172,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#25
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.