| Title |
Patient-reported outcomes in trials of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: a systematic literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rheumatology International, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00296-015-3416-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annie Huang, Isabel Castrejon |
| Abstract |
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are being increasingly recognized as important measures by rheumatologists. The objective of this review was to evaluate the frequency of use of PROs in studies of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed (up to April 2015) to identify any type of clinical studies reporting any type of PROs in patients with PMR. Articles were excluded if they did not include adults with PMR or did not report any PROs. Characteristics of each study such as study design, follow-up, treatment assessed if any, number of patients, mean age, gender, and a description of PROs used were collected to perform a descriptive analysis. From 118 initial studies captured, 28 articles met the predefined criteria, and 20 were finally included in this review. Ten studies (50 %) were randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and 8 (40 %) were cohorts. The most frequently reported domains were: pain (90 %), being the most frequent tool using a visual analogue scale; morning stiffness in minutes (85 %); and function (25 %), evaluated through the Health Assessment Questionnaire. Other domains such as patient global assessment, fatigue, quality of life, and anxiety and depression were infrequently reported. A larger proportion of PROs were included in cohorts in comparison with RCT. Pain and morning stiffness are the most frequently reported PROs. Other domains that may appear relevant for patients are infrequently reported, especially function. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,335,423
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology International
#1,977
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#332,387
of 395,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology International
#20
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.