You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A non-invasive technique to bleed incubating birds without trapping: a blood-sucking bug in a hollow egg
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ornithology, January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10336-005-0027-3 |
| Authors |
Peter H. Becker, Christian C. Voigt, Jennifer M. Arnold, Rolf Nagel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 20% |
| Faroe Islands | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 3% |
| United States | 5 | 3% |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Professor | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 121 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,839,982
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#253
of 1,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,978
of 154,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them