Title |
Population Policy: Abortion and Modern Contraception Are Substitutes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Demography, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13524-016-0492-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Grant Miller, Christine Valente |
Abstract |
A longstanding debate exists in population policy about the relationship between modern contraception and abortion. Although theory predicts that they should be substitutes, the empirical evidence is difficult to interpret. What is required is a large-scale intervention that alters the supply (or full price) of one or the other and, importantly, that does so in isolation (reproductive health programs often bundle primary health care and family planning-and in some instances, abortion services). In this article, we study Nepal's 2004 legalization of abortion provision and subsequent expansion of abortion services, an unusual and rapidly implemented policy meeting these requirements. Using four waves of rich individual-level data representative of fertile-age Nepalese women, we find robust evidence of substitution between modern contraception and abortion. This finding has important implications for public policy and foreign aid, suggesting that an effective strategy for reducing expensive and potentially unsafe abortions may be to expand the supply of modern contraceptives. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 11% |
United States | 1 | 11% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Croatia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 127 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
Researcher | 18 | 14% |
Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 17% |
Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 33 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 21% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Other | 17 | 13% |
Unknown | 27 | 21% |