| Title |
Fast and Efficient Transfection of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells Using Non-Viral Reagents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12015-016-9673-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christoffer Tamm, Sandeep Kadekar, Sara Pijuan-Galitó, Cecilia Annerén |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 56 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,751,793
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#180
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,788
of 370,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.