| Title |
Control of invasive American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus in small shallow water bodies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Wildlife Research, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10344-012-0655-x |
| Authors |
Gerald Louette, Sander Devisscher, Tim Adriaens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 21% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2012.
All research outputs
#6,914,371
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#316
of 904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,233
of 169,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Wildlife Research
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them