You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mapping awareness of breast and cervical cancer risk factors, symptoms and lay beliefs in Uganda and South Africa
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0240788 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J. Moodley, D. Constant, A. D. Mwaka, S. E. Scott, F. M. Walter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 50% |
South Africa | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 33 | 24% |
Researcher | 16 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Unknown | 42 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 34 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Unknown | 46 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,190,981
of 24,557,820 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#79,856
of 212,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,636
of 425,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,015
of 2,924 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,557,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,924 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.