You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using mode and maximum values from the Numeric Rating Scale when evaluating postoperative pain management and recovery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Clinical Nursing, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04225.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kerstin Eriksson, Lotta Wikström, Marianne Lindblad‐Fridh, Anders Broström |
Abstract |
To (1) examine the clinical applicability of compiled mode and maximum values from the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) by comparing the correspondence between patient perceptions of pain and pain values from monitoring records, as well as (2) to study the relationship between mode and maximum values and self-assessed ability for early postoperative recovery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 22% |
Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,102,862
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#4,715
of 5,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,649
of 175,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#46
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.